Verse of the Week
Then he said to them, but now, the one having a purse, let him take it; likewise
also a wallet; and, the one not having, let him sell his garment, and let him
buy a sword.
(Luke 22:36)
Thought for the Week
Folks
have historically jumped thru hoops trying to explain the above verse. Some
will say Jesus was speaking literally about everything except the sword. Some
say the sword is a spiritual reference only. Some say he did not mean it. Some
say it must have been added later. But, a rare few actually believe he meant
exactly what he said. The key is the context.
Those
that are against accepting it at face value often cite Jesus’ rebuke of Peter’s
use of a sword. Yet they ignore that Jesus qualified the use of restraint for a
reason - Jesus must suffer to fulfill the Scriptures. Some will cite the
command to love your enemies for rejecting the above verse at face value. They
ignore the difference between an enemy and a common criminal. First, it is
obvious Jesus did not forbid his disciples being armed; and, second, YHWH has
always sanctioned the use of violence in the fulfillment of justice (e.g.
stoning).
In
context the Apostles are told that the two swords they have are sufficient.
Would not two armed men be ample to protect the group from the average mugger?
Yet two armed men untrained in warfare would stand no chance at all against an
enemy (e.g. a trained Roman soldier). We are commanded not to murder. We are
not told not to kill in self-defense. (SEE NOTE)
Did
Jesus rebuke the Roman Centurion for his profession? No, in fact he
complimented the man’s faith. YHWH is the same yesterday and forever: The “God”
of the Original Testament is the same “God” of the New Testament. There is no
contradiction. It is not His instructions that are lacking; it is man’s
inability to understand. Understanding requires spiritual reasoning taught by
the Holy Spirit. The spiritual cannot be ascertained by physical reasoning.
Violence to
fulfill His will is permissible. Violence for any other reason is not. We know
from His instructions that it is not His will that any be forced to worship Him
(a prime indicator that Muslims and Catholics are not the children of YHWH). We
know from His instructions war for conquest is not allowed unless He
specifically orders it; but, that warfare is permitted by His people in
self-defense. Love your enemy requires that you do not invade him and try to
dominate him. It does not require you to
kneel to Satan minions. Did not Jesus use his gifts from the Holy Spirit to
evade capture “until all be fulfilled”? Did not the Apostles use deception to
evade persecution so they could spread the Gospel?
Does this era end
by YHWH just zapping Satan and his ilk into oblivion? No, it ends in a violent
battle - those who worship YHWH against those who do not. Until that day the
worshippers of YHWH have a duty to continue spreading the Gospel - even if that
means we must do so clandestinely. We cannot murder the tyrant but we must try
to subvert his efforts. We cannot launch preemptive attacks but we can defend
ourselves.
Muslims accuse
the US of being “The Great Satan”. It is fast becoming a tool of Satan as it
increasingly persecutes YHWH’s followers and enforces immorality upon its own
citizens. It even uses its economic power to try to enforce immorality on other
countries (e.g. acceptance of homosexuality). America is falling because it
increasingly serves Satan instead of YHWH. Are you prepared to serve YHWH even
as persecution increases? How will you do so?
NOTE:
Jesus taught to give to him that asks, he did not teach to surrender to
thieves. Jesus used strength and being armed as defense against thieves (e.g.
Mark 3:27, Luke 11:21, etc). In point of fact under Noahide law we are required
to administer criminal and civil justice.
Quote of the Week
The free
citizens were idle, dissipated, sunken; their chief thoughts of the theatre and
the arena; and they were mostly supported at the public cost. While, even in
the time of Augustus, more than two hundred thousand persons were thus
maintained by the State, what of the old Roman stock remained was rapidly
decaying, partly from corruption, but chiefly from the increasing cessation of
marriage, and the nameless abominations of what remained of family-life -
Alfred Edersheim (1825-1889) - describing what happened to the Roman Empire
Comment: The
problems cited for Roman society are a perfect parallel for what we see in the
US today. The only thing left is the downfall itself - the crumbling is already
well underway. Are you prepared?
Did You Know
The US
FDA is considering making it legal for doctors to make “three parent babies”. COMMENT: Ever wondered who is really
behind the Governments continued funding for Planned Parenthood? If so read the
history of eugenics and socialism. The end goal of socialism is a society ruled
by Patricians (elites) and served by Plebs (commoners); but, the Plebs must not
have any personal values - i.e. the old fashioned American value of freedom,
the biblical value of morality, etc.
The
number of sexual assaults in the U.S. military is at an all-time high with the
majority of them being male on male. COMMENT:
The Pentagons solution appears to be relieving sexual tension among the troops
by providing more transgender personnel.
The original motto of Harvard University was Veritas
Christo et Ecclesiae (Latin for "Truth for Christ and the Church")
which was appropriate since Harvard is named after a minister who donated a
large sum of money to create an educational institute to train Christian
ministers. Now the motto is just Veritas. COMMENT:
Now instead of ministers the focus is to train left wing lawyers and
politicians. Most of them, it seems, are not satisfied with just removing
Christ and the church from their alma mater: It seems they are intent on
removing Christ and the church from all of American society.
Extra:
The Abridged New Testament (without the writings of Paul but with the OGM, the Didache,
& Study Guides) is entering the final edit phase. I am working on my next
project: A How-to Manual for a Christian Underground (covering covert and
clandestine operations, strategy & tactics, structure & form,
communication, OPSEC, tradecraft, CI/FID methods/tactics, and more).
No comments:
Post a Comment