The Biblical Principle of Two Witnesses
(and how Paul fails the test)
The principle of requiring two witnesses to
establish a truth is a basic concept throughout the Bible. Two witnesses are so important to God that He
even complied with the concept Himself in both the Old and New Testament.
First, in the Old Testament, we find we are told:
Deuteronomy 17:6 - At the mouth of two witnesses, or three
witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one
witness he shall not be put to death.
Deuteronomy 19:15 - One witness shall not rise up against a man
for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinned: at the mouth of
two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be
established.
Second, in the Old Testament, we find that what we commonly refer to as
the “ark of the covenant” was originally the “ark of the testimony” (look it up
- even in the KJV - i.e. Exodus 25:22, 26:33, etc. - over a dozen times). It
was the ark of the testimony because it held the “testimony” of God - the Ten
Commandments as written by God Himself (Exodus 31:18). These two tables (we
call them tablets today) were called the “two tables of testimony” (i.e. Exodus
32:15, 34:29). Note that in the Old Testament the word “‛êdûth” is translated as testimony as well
as witness. Strong defines it so as well: testimony, witness.
In the New Testament we find that
Jesus showed He was very familiar with this principle:
John 8:17 - It is also written in your law,
that the testimony of two men is true.
Jesus showed that He knew that even He required a “second”
witness:
John 8:18 - I am one that bear witness of
myself, and the Father that sent me bears witness of me.
We see God doing this for Jesus in several passages - Matthew
3:17, Matthew 17:5, Mark 1:11 and Luke 3:22). Note that even in the New
Testament God continues to comply with the “two witnesses” concept He created.
Jesus even
arranged for another witness for Himself - The Holy Spirit:
John 15:26 - But when the Comforter is come, whom I
will send unto you from the Father, the Spirit
of truth, which proceeds from the Father, he shall testify of me:
Again, as in the Old Testament, we see
that the New Testament word “martureō”
- translated
here as “testify” - also means witness (and is usually translated as such).
Strong’s definition: to be a witness. Thayer’s definition: to
be a witness, to bear witness.
Jesus
continued to show this principle is still applicable for us when He commanded:
Matthew 18:16 - But if he will not hear,
take with you one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses
every word may be established.
We even find that this principle will
still be in effect in the “end times”:
Revelation 11:3 - And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand
two hundred and threescore
days, clothed in sackcloth.
Oddly enough, even Paul showed that he
understood this principle was valid and still in effect:
2 Corinthians 13:1 - This is
the third time I am coming to
you. In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established.
Now we reach the crux of the matter - Paul’s
conflicting stories regarding his alleged Apostleship. We have no record of any
witnesses ever being named or ever coming forward.
Further, of those who Paul claimed where present on the road to
Damascus with him, there are conflicting stories. In one account, the others
(who are never identified) hear but don’t see:
Acts 9:7 - And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing
a voice, but seeing no man.
In another account, the others (still
never identified) see but don’t hear:
Acts 22:9 - And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and
were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spoke to me.
Not only are we left without a second
witness to vouch for Paul, we have conflicting stories about what any possible
witnesses may have witnessed!
Some have tried to claim Ananias is
Paul’s witness (Acts 9:17). That is absurd for many reasons. First, it is
saying Ananias having a vision of Paul experiencing something is the same as
Ananias witnessing it himself. Second, it would beg the question of a second
witness to vouch for Ananias. Furthermore, if one is determined to give
credence to Ananias, note that Ananias (in Acts 9:17) calls Paul a brother and
says the vision was so that Paul would become a Christian (receive the Holy
Ghost). Nowhere is it implied that Paul was given any special message. He never
refers to Paul as an apostle - a messenger. Even in yet another account (Acts
22:13/15), Ananias calls Paul a brother and says Paul is to be a witness. We
are all to be witnesses! Ananias never called Paul an apostle or implied that
Paul was to be such. Ananias cannot be considered a witness for Paul’s
Apostleship.
The incident is mentioned three separate
times and never does anyone, even Paul himself, refer to anyone as a witness to
Paul’s claims. Paul tried, at various times, to claim he spoke the truth by
claiming God, Jesus, the Holy Spirit, and even his own conscience, were
witnesses for proof (i.e. Romans 1:9 and 9:1)! When Jesus said God was a
witness for Him God spoke where others could hear it. Paul fails in every way
possible for establishing credentials as an apostle with a little “a”, much
less to be considered an Apostle with a big “A”.
In Brotherly
Love,
Wayne
PS - More
conflicting stories concerning Paul:
In Acts 9:6 and Acts 22:10, Paul says
he is told to go into the city and then he will be told what to do; yet, in
Acts 26:16/18, Paul claims he was given his instruction then and there.
Paul contradicts the Gospels on who and
when Jesus appeared to when He was resurrected; and, adds that Jesus appeared
to him (1 Corinthians 15:3-8).
In Acts 26:19/20
and 9:20, Paul begins preaching immediately. In Galatians 1:16/18 he waited
three years.
In Galatians 1:12, Paul claims that he
learned the Gospel by revelation from Jesus. The problem here is Jesus was very
clear that after He ascended we would be taught not by Him but by the Holy Spirit
(John 14:16, 14:26, 15:26, and 16:7).
Paul claimed he would not spare those
that sinned - 2 Corinthians 13:2. He was upset because they doubted he was
legit - 2 Corinthians 13:3. He tried to tell them they were the living proof he
was legit. If they were good it was because of him getting them approved by
Christ; and, if they weren’t good it was because they weren’t approved of by
Christ.
The list could go on quite a ways;
but, that’s another issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment